WebNov 9, 2024 · Board. See Bowling v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 1, 8 (2001) (rejecting, in TDIU context, “the Board’s use of double negatives” in finding that “[m]edical evidence that the … http://www.uscourts.cavc.gov/documents/Gallegos_99-106.pdf
Single Judge Application; TDIU; three errors; Bowling v. Principi, 15 ...
WebPrincipi, 17 Vet. App. 20, 26 (2003); Bowling v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 1, 14 (2001). The Board has considered all the evidence of record in light of the criteria noted above, and finds that by resolving all reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran, the severity of the Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disability since the effective date ... Web9.3. Reasons and Bases of BVA Determinations. The Board must provide a statement of the reasons or bases for its determination, adequate to enable an appellant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision, as well as to facilitate review in the Court. 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d) (1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. galois group of transcendental extension
Single Judge Application; Acoustic Trauma ... - Veteranclaims
Websee Vargas-Gonzalez v. Principi, 15 Ve t.A pp. 222 , 230 (2001) (hold ing that VB IA § 30 2 applies to all elements of a claim remanded by Court or Board), and with all applicable law and regulation. See Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533-34 (1995). On remand, the appellant will be free to Webin the united states court of appeals for veterans claims _____ no. 22-4960 _____ daniel e. belt, WebC:\USCAVC_Docs\SINGLE.CVA\Clarence E. Varner - #06-1144.wpd Clarence E. Varner - #06-1144.wpd galois group of cyclotomic field